Current:Home > ScamsHouse passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat -Wealth Legacy Solutions
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
View
Date:2025-04-12 02:05:16
WASHINGTON (AP) — What was once a bipartisan effort to expand by 66 the number of federal district judgeships across the country passed the House of Representatives on Thursday, though prospects for becoming law are murky after Republicans opted to bring the measure to the floor only after President-elect Donald Trump had won a second term.
The legislation spreads out the establishment of the new trial court judgeships over more than a decade to give three presidential administrations and six Congresses the chance to appoint the new judges. It was carefully designed so that lawmakers would not knowingly give an advantage to either political party when it comes to shaping the federal judiciary.
The Senate passed the measure unanimously in August, but the Republican-led House brought it to the floor only after the election results were known. The bill passed by a vote of 236-173 Thursday with the vast majority of Democrats opposed.
The White House said Tuesday that if President Joe Bidenwere presented with the bill, he would veto it. That likely dooms the bill this Congress, as overruling him would require a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate. The House vote Thursday fell well short of that.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the sponsor of the House version of the bill, apologized to colleagues “for the hour we’re taking for something we should have done before the mid-term elections.”
“But we are where we are,” Issa said, warning that failure to pass the legislation would lead to a greater case backlog that he said is already costing American businesses billions of dollars and forcing prosecutors to take more plea agreements from criminal defendants.
“It would only be pettiness today if we were not to do this because of who got to be first,” Issa said.
But Democrats said the agreement central to the bill was broken by GOP leaders because they opted not to bring it up for a vote before the election.
“Unfortunately, we are back where we have always been every time a bill to create new judgeships comes before Congress — with one party seeking a tactical advantage over the other,” said Rep. Jerry Nadler, the lead Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.
Organizations representing judges and attorneys urged Congress to vote yes, regardless of the timing of congressional action. They said that a lack of new judgeships has contributed to profound delays in the resolution of cases and serious concerns about access to justice.
“Failure to enact the JUDGES Act will condemn our judicial system to more years of unnecessary delays and will deprive parties in the most impacted districts from obtaining appropriate justice and timely relief under the rule of law,” the presidents of the Federal Judges Association and Federal Bar Association said in a joint statement issued before the vote.
The change of heart from some Democrats and the new urgency from House Republicans for considering it underscored the contentious politics that surrounds federal judicial vacancies.
Senate roll-call votes are required for almost every judicial nominee these days, and most votes for the Supreme Court and appellate courts are now decided largely along party lines. Lawmakers are generally hesitant to hand presidents from the opposing party new opportunities to shape the judiciary.
Nadler said the bill would give Trump 25 judicial nominations on top of the 100-plus spots that are expected to open up over the next four years. He said that Trump used his first term to stack the courts with “dangerously unqualified and ideological appointees.”
“Giving him more power to appoint additional judges would be irresponsible,” Nadler said.
Nadler said he’s willing to take up comparable legislation in the years ahead and give the additional judicial appointments to “unknown presidents yet to come,” but until then, he was urging colleagues to vote against the bill.
Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, said the bill would create 10 new judges in his state and authorize additional courtroom locations to improve access for rural residents. He said it would reduce case backlogs and ensure the administration of justice in a reasonable time frame.
“Make no mistake folks, the sudden opposition to this bill from my friends on the other side of the aisle is nothing more than childish foot-stomping,” Nehls said.
Congress last authorized a new district judgeship more than 20 years ago, while the number of cases being filed continues to increase with litigants often waiting years for a resolution.
Last year, the policy-making body for the federal court system, the Judicial Conference of the United States, recommendedthe creation of several new district and court of appeals judgeships to meet increased workload demands in certain courts.
But in its veto threat earlier this week, the White House Office of Management and Budget said the legislation would create new judgeships in states where senators have sought to hold open existing judicial vacancies.
“These efforts to hold open vacancies suggest that concerns about judicial economy and caseload are not the true motivating force behind passage of the law,” the White House said.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- 2 sisters from Egypt were among those killed in Mexican army shooting
- Ex-Detroit Lions quarterback Greg Landry dies at 77
- Christina Hall Lists Her Tennessee Home for Sale Amid Divorce From Josh Hall
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Billy Shaw, Pro Football Hall of Famer and Buffalo Bills great, dead at 85
- Stellantis recalls nearly 130,000 Ram 1500 pickup trucks for a turn signal malfunction
- Former owner of water buffalo that roamed Iowa suburb for days pleads guilty
- Jay Kanter, veteran Hollywood producer and Marlon Brando agent, dies at 97: Reports
- Civil rights groups ask to extend voter registration deadlines in hurricane-ravaged states
Ranking
- Illinois governor calls for resignation of sheriff whose deputy fatally shot Black woman in her home
- Yoga business founder pleads guilty to tax charge in New York City
- Evidence of alleged sexual abuse to be reviewed in Menendez brothers case, prosecutors say
- Boy Meets World's Maitland Ward Details Set Up Rivalry Between Her & Danielle Fishel
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Several states may see northern lights this weekend: When and where could aurora appear?
- How Texas Diminished a Once-Rigorous Air Pollution Monitoring Team
- 'I let them choose their own path'; give kids space with sports, ex-college, NFL star says
Recommendation
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
Mariah Carey talks American Music Awards performance, 30 years of 'All I Want for Christmas'
NFL Week 5 bold predictions: Which players, teams will surprise the most?
Ariana DeBose talks 'House of Spoils' and why she's using her platform to get out the vote
USA men's volleyball mourns chance at gold after losing 5-set thriller, will go for bronze
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Spring Forward
SEC, Big Ten lead seven Top 25 college football Week 6 games to watch
Chancellor of Louisiana Delta Community College will resign in June